Another option we thought worth going into a little bit of detail on is Vcore support. Vcore is adjustable in the AX4C Max's BIOS up to 1.850V in 0.0250V increments. Even though 0.0250V increments aren't as fine as other adjustments in other motherboard's BIOSes, 1.850V is an excellent ceiling for AOpen to set. Overclockers will have all the room they need to ratchet up their FSB. On that note, we should mention that the AX4C Max undervolts quite a bit according to CPU-Z (version 1.18) and the BIOS PC Health section. We noticed an average undervolt of about 0.060V-0.065V. Therefore, you will want to set your Vcore to 1.60V in the BIOS if you want your 800MHz FSB CPU to run at its real default Vcore (1.525V) or 1.625V if you have a 3.0C processor (default Vcore for this CPU = 1.55V).

Despite all the positive things we have to say about the AX4C Max, we did run into some heat issues with this motherboard. The first and most significant of the heat issues with the AX4C Max was the active cooler used to cool the 875P North Bridge. This heatsink was still very warm to the touch compared to other North Bridge heatsinks. Secondly, despite the fact that we didn't have time to measure exactly how hot our 3.0C (HT enabled) was running, the CPU HSF was definitely much warmer to the touch installed in an AOpen AX4C Max motherboard than with any other P4 motherboard tested here today.

The third and final heat issue came from the massive passive heatsink used to cool one of the voltage regulators to the left of the North Bridge. This heatsink was not warm, it was burning hot, so hot that we could not touch this heatsink for more than 4 seconds without burning an index finger. AOpen needs to address the AX4C Max's layout, as it is simply not adequately dissipating heat.

AOpen AX4C Max DFI PRO875: Basic Features
Comments Locked

18 Comments

View All Comments

  • Anonymous User - Thursday, July 24, 2003 - link

    Could anyone clarify if the information for the sound system on the Abit IS7 is correct? The article lists it as being an Analog Devices AD1985. I thought it was Realtek?

    Thanks,
    Harry
  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, July 23, 2003 - link

    What a great article!
    We're waiting for the Part 2... :B
  • Evan Lieb - Monday, July 21, 2003 - link

    I bet that the Part 1 thread would be posted by a certain date, and it was indeed posted on that date. I never anything about Part 2, because I've been thinking of adding more benchmarks and data in general to round out any and all Pentium 4 motherboard testing until Prescott arrives.

    Anonymous User #4, you should always research your recollections if you can't exactly "recall" certain events correctly. ;)
  • Evan Lieb - Monday, July 21, 2003 - link

  • Anonymous User - Friday, July 18, 2003 - link

    As I recall, Evan made a bet on the part 2 being posted a while back.... the thread was mysteriously removed though.
  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, July 16, 2003 - link

    So, what month/year will part 2 be posted?
  • Anonymous User - Sunday, July 6, 2003 - link

    I read that the Epox 4pca3+ could do a 1,85 vcore with a bois update.. If anyone know where to find this bios update, please e-mail me zimen1@msn.com
    I really can't find it.
  • Anonymous User - Sunday, July 6, 2003 - link

    I also fried my MSI 875P Neo-FIS2R when I updated the BIOS from 1.2 to 1.4. I got a replacement board, but have been hesitant to try again based on my prior experience. Based on your experience with 1.5, (and now 1.6 is available), I'm willing to take another chance.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now