DFI NFII Ultra: Tech Support and RMA


For your reference, we will repost our support evaluation procedure here:

The way our Tech Support evaluation works is first, we anonymously email the manufacturer's tech support address(es), obviously not using our AnandTech mail server to avoid any sort of preferential treatment. Our emails (we can and will send more than one just to make sure we're not getting the staff on an "off" day) all contain fixable problems that we've had with our motherboard. We allow the manufacturer up to 72 (business) hours to respond, and then we will report whether or not they responded within the time allotted, and if they were successful in fixing our problems. In case we don’t receive a response before the review is published, any future responses will be added to the review, including the total time it took for the manufacturer to respond to our requests.

The idea here is to encourage manufacturers to improve their technical support as well as provide new criteria upon which to base your motherboard purchasing decisions. As motherboards become more similar everyday, we have to help separate the boys from the men in as many ways as possible. As usual, we're interested in your feedback on this and other parts of our reviews, so please do email us with your comments.


DFI’s easily obtainable RMA policy can be found by visiting their U.S. website at www.dfiusa.com and by clicking on the Support hyperlink at the menu listed on the left of their home page. The international DFI site is linked from this site, or can be accessed at www.dfi.com. Further Technical Support and FAQ's are available at this main site. There are links at the main site to a dedicated site for the LanParty series motherboards, which can be directly accessed at www.lanparty.com.tw. If you would like to RMA your DFI motherboard, DFI suggests that you should first contact the vendor from where you purchased your motherboard before reaching out to DFI's tech support and RMA.

For US customers, Technical Support is available by email at techsupport@dfiweb.com. DFI's tech support response time was excellent, coming in just 26 hours after our original email. The reply from the technical support representative was a sincere attempt to solve our problem, and the advice offered was helpful. The experience left a very positive impression of DFI’s commitment to customer satisfaction. Hopefully, some of the more recognized motherboard makers will follow in the footsteps of companies like DFI in terms of tech support.

DFI offers very clear instructions for motherboard returns as well as any technical support questions – for both US and international customers. Those who cannot find a local resource should send their Tech Support inquiries to the main site in Taiwan. DFI seems to be expanding their on-line resources, and there was more on-line information available than we found in the last look at DFI. There is more good news: the information and resources are easy to find without going through endless links. DFI has done an outstanding job of making customer service a priority, and we think many of you will be pleasantly surprised at the responsiveness you will find in your contacts at DFI.

DFI NFII Ultra: Stress Testing Performance Test Configuration
Comments Locked

46 Comments

View All Comments

  • Jeff7181 - Thursday, July 31, 2003 - link

    ... and another thing.

    What the hell is with showing ONE benchmark results for the Gun Metal DX9 tests? What a complete waste of time those were!
  • Jeff7181 - Thursday, July 31, 2003 - link

    I'm not impressed by this article. Comparing 4 motherboards huh? Don't strain yourselves over there guys.
    How bout throwing in a couple of the most popular motherboards for AMD rigs? Like the Asus A7N8X Deluxe and Epox 8RDA+
    Seems like that would be the smart thing to do since people would be able to relate the performance a lot easier.
  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, July 30, 2003 - link

    You are F-ing kidding me right>?!

    "Many benchmarks show widely different results with different video hardware, so we have indicated benchmarks run with the ATI Radeon 9800 PRO with an asterisk. Benchmarks without an asterisk were run with the nVidia Ti4600."

    So you didn't use the same video card to compare both the NF2 Ultra boards? That is just bad form. Gee I wonder if the motherboard with the 9800 will be a little faster? DUh.
  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, July 30, 2003 - link

    We described the Raid 1.5 feature in this review, because many readers of our earlier DFI 875PRO review have asked questions about how this feature is supposed to work. We did not test the performance of Raid 1.5, so we did not comment on how it actually performs compared to other RAID configurations.
  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, July 30, 2003 - link

    Are you sure about RAID 1.5 too? I've seen several reports that it's nothing more than RAID 1(mirroring) with data being simultaniously read off both drives, which is in turn something a good RAID 1 controller should do anyhow, making RAID 1.5 marketing fluff.
  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, July 30, 2003 - link

    Corrections are in process right now. When a review is written it is spell-checked, emailed, and then actually posted by a Managing Editor who is located thousands of miles from my location. The graphs are also created from formatted raw data at that point. Since I am new to Anandtech, then these kinds of errors do happen, and we take them very seriously.

    I sincerely apologize, but the errors will be corrected very soon. Since I am learning the Anandtech procedures, the fault is mine.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now