Asus P4C800-E: Updating the Intel Flagship
by Wesley Fink on August 30, 2003 10:55 PM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
Asus P4C800-E: Stress Testing
We performed stress tests on the P4C800-E in these areas and configurations:1. Chipset and motherboard stress testing, which was conducted by running the FSB at 288 MHz with OCZ 3700 GOLD at 5:4 memory ratio (DDR461) with 2 x 256MB double-bank dimms at 2-3-4-6 timings.
2. Memory stress testing, which was conducted by running Corsair 3200LL RAM at 400 MHz with all 4 DIMM slots filled. Two pairs of Corsair TwinX ver.1.2 was used for this test at the lowest memory timings possible. We tested the Corsair because it was one of the memory brands that was not completely stable in the earlier P4C800 Deluxe.
Front Side Bus Stress Test Results:
We ran a full range of stress tests and benchmarks to ensure that the Asus P4C800-E was absolutely stable at each overclocked FSB speed. These stress tests included Prime95 torture tests, which were run in the background for a total of 24 hours.In addition, we ran several other tasks — data compression, various DX8 and DX9 games, and apps like Word and Excel — while Prime95 was running in the background. Finally, we ran our benchmark suite, which includes ZD Winstone suite, Unreal Tournament 2003, SPECViewperf 7.0, and Gun Metal Benchmark 2.
In addition to tests with 2 DS dimms, we ran tests with 4 DS OCZ 3700 GOLD (4X256) at 288 FSB. With 4 Dimms, we needed to reduce the FSB to 284 to achieve stability at default voltage. In addition, we discovered that 4 double-bank dimms apparently turn-off PAT above 200FSB. This was confirmed by both CPUZ 1.18C and Sandra tests results. At 800FSB (200) 4DS dimms tested faster than 2 DS dimms, while at 1136FSB (284) 4 DS dimms tested slower than 2 DS dimms. CPUZ 1.18C shows Performance Mode “enabled” with 2 DS dimms and with 4 DS dimms at 800FSB. With 4 DS dimms at 1136FSB (284), CPUZ shows Performance Mode “disabled”. 4 SS dimms show Performance Mode “enabled” at all speeds, and Memory Tests confirm PAT is working.
Asus has been contacted for a fix or comments on the high-speed 4 DS dimm issue. We are also investigating whether this is an issue with all 875 boards, or whether it is unique to the P4C800-E. Running 4 DS dimms at 284 FSB is something most users of the P4C800-E will never do, so it is not a huge issue. We will post additional information on this issue here as we have it.
Memory Stress Test Results:
The memory stress test is very simple, as it tests the ability of the P4C800-E to operate at its officially supported memory frequency (400MHz DDR) at the lowest supported memory timings that our Corsair TwinX LL ver. 1.2 can achieve:Stable Dual DDR400 Timings (4/4 banks/2 dual-channel populated) |
|
Clock Speed: | 200MHz |
Timing Mode: | Auto |
CAS Latency: | 2.0 |
Bank Interleave: | N/A |
RAS to CAS Delay: | 3T |
RAS Precharge: | 5T |
Precharge Delay: | 2T |
Command Rate: | 1T |
There have been many reports of problems with Corsair 3200LL on the P4C800 Deluxe, though later BIOS revisions appear to work much better with Corsair memory. We had no problems at all running 4 dimms of 3200LL at 2-2-3-5, which is a bit faster than the Corsair SPD 2-2-3-6 timings.
Since we just used the Asus P4C800-E as our test board for “Searching for the Memory Holy Grail — Part 2”, we were also able to test this Asus with Adata PC4000, Adata PC3500, Corsair XMS4000, Geil Platinum 4000, Kingston HyperX4000, OCZ 4000, and OCZ 3700 GOLD. We had no problem at all with any of the memory tested. The P4C800-E was completely compatible with all the test dimms at both SPD and more aggressive memory timings and voltages.
30 Comments
View All Comments
jsapyta - Sunday, October 17, 2004 - link
Is this board good for gaming or should I switch to a AMD board?aditm - Thursday, December 18, 2003 - link
Can I have this Board please? Can I, Can I ?If so ... what am I sopose to do with it?
:(
Aniway Thanks !
:)
Anonymous User - Thursday, October 23, 2003 - link
Thank you for your excellent review. To have theP4C800-E support both RAID 0 and RAID 1, would two
disks in RAID 0 configuration be connected to the two ICH5R SATA ports and another two disks in RAID
0 configuration be connected to the two Promise
PDC20378 SATA ports and then these two 2 disk RAID 0 arrays be configured to RAID 1 (mirroring)?
Anonymous User - Friday, October 10, 2003 - link
I too am having trouble loading a clean install onto a Raid Array, any insight would be appreciatedAnonymous User - Friday, September 12, 2003 - link
Using two WD raptors with the Asus P4c800-E want to run in Raid 0. I get in the raid set up but when I try to install windows [XP pro] I load the raid drivers {F6] window loads drivers.When it says loading windows for about two mins I get blue screen error something about drives or controllers not con figured. Could you shed some light on this problem. Works fine when using sata [non raid] Thanks NWAnonymous User - Wednesday, September 10, 2003 - link
OK, I vaguely remember the 1.5 vs 2.0 issue for Prescott. However, what about the 100+ watts that made a problem with motherboard power supplies? Has this issue been resolved? The Asus web site and the manual state, "New power design supports next generation Intel PrescottCPU. Does this mean this motherboard has fixed the power issue. Also, what CPU heat sink/fan combination was used for the testing with 250+MHz FSB?Anonymous User - Wednesday, September 3, 2003 - link
0sparkie - Wednesday, September 3, 2003 - link
Thanks,If I have any stability problems I ' ll inform U.
Icewind - Wednesday, September 3, 2003 - link
Its a 9800 which conforms to all the standards on mobos, so your fine.Anonymous User - Wednesday, September 3, 2003 - link
I believe the manual's reference to the ATI card versions is concerning the old problems with stability and enabling AGP 8x on early versions of these video cards on AGP 8x motherboards. I have a 1 year old 9700 Pro running perfectly on this motherboard at 8x with fast writes enabled, but I am not overclocking.