2.8E vs 2.8C: General Performance
PCMark2004 is turning out to be a much better benchmark for measuring system performance than the earlier 2002 version. As we have compilied a database of PCMark2004 results, we are finding the 2004 version to be a good measure of overall system performance, which is confirmed by other benchmarks.
ATI Radeon 9100 IGP PRO exhibits the same behavior here as in the other tests comparing Prescott and Northwood. While the differences are small, RS350 performs the same or better with the Prescott "E" processor.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
24 Comments
View All Comments
araczynski - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link
Who that comes to this site give a flying f*ck about integrated graphics?? Whether you're comparing a Yugo GV or a Yugo GVX, ITS STILL A FRICKING YUGO!!!where are the x800 bencharks?? that's what we care about.
Regs - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link
To bad the 2.8 Prescott's are worthless considering how they hardly out shine their Northwood counter parts. But it's interesting to see how a Prescott tweaked mobo performed.Marsumane - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link
Integrated graphics that still suck!Although they are just like the comparison between the 9800xt and the 6800u. 2x as fast)
MAME - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link
nVidia -> King of AthlonXPsATI -> King of Prescotts