Pentium 4 3.46 Extreme Edition and 925XE: 1066MHz FSB Support is Here
by Anand Lal Shimpi on October 31, 2004 3:00 PM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
Intel D925XECV2: Basic Features
The Intel 925XE chipset is essentially the 925X chipset with the addition of a 1066 FSB option. You can find more information on the 925X chipset in the AnandTech 925x/915 launch article.
| Intel D925XECV2 Motherboard Specifications | |
| CPU Interface | Socket T (Intel LGA-775) |
| Power Interface | 24-pin (775 & Server) ATX and 4-pin 12V |
| Chipset | Intel 925XE/Intel ICH6R |
| Bus Speeds | -2% to +10% in 1% increments |
| PCI Express Speeds | 100 to 109.24 in 1.32MHz increments |
| PCI Speeds | Default (33.33MHz), 36.35, 40.0 |
| Core Voltage | No CPU Voltage Adjustments |
| DRAM Voltage | Default, 1.8V to 2.1V in 0.1V increments |
| PCI Express Voltage | No PCIe Voltage Adjustments |
| DRAM Speeds | 266,333,400,533,667 |
| Memory Slots | Four 240-pin DDR2 Dual-Channel Slots Memory to 4GB Total |
| Expansion Slots | 1 x16 PCI Express Slot 2 x1 PCI Express Slots 4 PCI Slots |
| Onboard SATA | 4-Drive SATA by ICH6R |
| Onboard PATA | One Standard PATA IDE 100/66/33 (2-drives) |
| SATA/IDE RAID | 4-Drive Intel Matrix RAID With Native Command Queuing |
| Onboard USB 2.0/IEEE-1394 | 8 USB 2.0 ports supported by ICH6R 3 1394A FireWire ports by ICH6R |
| Onboard LAN | 1 Gigabit PCIe Ethernet by Marvel 88E8050-NNC |
| Onboard Audio | Realtek ALC8800 High-Definition Audio Codec |
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
63 Comments
View All Comments
IntelUser2000 - Monday, November 1, 2004 - link
Intel is not doing bad. They are doing terrible. So terrible that you might as well call them dead. Probably will last till 2009 before they fill bankruptcy.To those people who say people in forums don't know anything and that there are other people stupid enough to buy Intel chips(I mean all Intel chips): Uhh, yeah, get your head straight, since AMD is closing with Intel very rapidly in marketshare, in server, desktop, and laptop, and that means that gamers actually do make a difference(albeit slowly) making other people buy computers. You think other people will buy P4's because of high clock speed? That's BS, since people who is stupid enough to buy Intel chips don't even know what clock speeds does. There are only a very few that knows computers JUST enough to say clock speed is good.
Tides - Monday, November 1, 2004 - link
believe me, everyone wants the best they can get for the least cash.FinalFantasy - Monday, November 1, 2004 - link
Intel is not doing good right now. I know a lot of people rested their hopes for Intel to strike back with the release of this chip. But alas, we are still seeing the same problems with this chip as we've seen with it's predecessors.1. Way overpriced
2. Still getting whooped by AMD's 64-bit chips
The choice is clear here, buy an average AMD chip for a fraction of the price and still be able to outperform your friend's Intel EE based machine that he spent $2,500-3,000 on to build, while you spent about $1,500 (factor in price a person pays for an Intel EE chip and a couple of sticks of DDR2).
Pandaren - Monday, November 1, 2004 - link
What the community here forgets is that the common person doesn't care for 10 extra FPS in a game or 3 seconds faster on that photoshop filter. They want a reliable, dependable computer with good support at a reasonable price.Dell provides that with Intel chips. People honestly don't care if the Intel chip is not faster.
Those of us who do care about performance and price/performance will build our own. I replaced my Dell with a homebuilt AMD box for that reason, but I don't expect everyone to do the same.
SLIM - Monday, November 1, 2004 - link
"SLIMYou're forgetting DDR2 price which this needs in your so called Intel is "cheaper" comparison. If you want the same price setup you can get a FX-55 and really bring the wood."
ZEBO
Perhaps you didn't read my post correctly or didn't read the review, but the first paragraph in post #14 is a direct quote from the review (that's why there are QUOTATION MARKS around it). The two comments below the QUOTE were my views on Anand's conclusion of the 560 v 3800 comparison at the end of the review. Your comment actually agrees with what I said.
Tides - Monday, November 1, 2004 - link
they would if they had itswatX - Monday, November 1, 2004 - link
why doesnt intel just release a dual core platform or a 64bit chip already..gezz its like they are acting like ATI "we will release 64-vit chips only when apps start to use it" ...NotMrT - Monday, November 1, 2004 - link
Last time i remember AMD domminating this much was in the time of the thunderbirdsChapbass - Monday, November 1, 2004 - link
#43:One thing that i can vouch for, being a college student: Almost every college student not "in the know" with building systems buys a dell....because theyre sold through the college. At least my college they are. DEFINITELY the most common systems around here (and it makes me sick) : P.
It seems like households are more into HP/compaq, where schools, both k-12 and college, are totally dell.
Just something ive noticed around where im from. YMMV.
-Chap
justly - Sunday, October 31, 2004 - link
I find it interesting that the page compareing an A64 3800+ to the P4 560 shows the P4 winning the multitasking content creation. Well that isn't the interesting part, but the fact that Intel only won this because it took all three SYSmark tests is (the SYSmark tests wher the only thing Intel won in this catagory). I guess what really amuses me is remembering a comment in a article a while back (I think it was Anand himself who made the comment) implying that the SYSmark scores did not reflect the rest of their testing and that it seemed to favor Intel.