AMD Athlon 64 FX-57: The Fastest Single Core
by Derek Wilson on June 27, 2005 11:47 AM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
Final Words
Clearly the FX-57 is the fastest single core processor money can buy right now. But is it worth it?The price is exorbitant, the speed increase over previous FX processors is not extreme, and the industry is focused firmly on multiple core architectures. We are no longer at point in time where this launch is extremely important. The battles have been fought and AMD already won the fight for single threaded performance.
For end users who need a high performing single core, the 4000+ is quite capable and affords a savings of more than $550. For those who have the money to burn, the X2 4800+ costs just over $1000 as well and will provide smoother multitasking and higher performance in applications that only modestly benefit from multithreading.
The FX-57 isn't as overclockable as previous parts (based on our experience with one sample). Our FX-53 would easily run at 2.6GHz, and the FX-55 could run stable at 2.8GHz if we took extra care to keep it cool. Our FX-57 didn't even pretend to make it through our stability test at 3GHz.
There may be some corporation or individual who absolutely must have single core performance at all costs. In that situation, the FX-57 is the fastest option and the best fit. Of course, that demographic doesn't even show up on the radar. The real answer to our question is that the FX-57 is not worth the price. With options almost as fast at just about half the price or hardware that has the potential for more speed and a smoother experience priced the same, the choice for the desktop end user is clearly not the FX-57.
56 Comments
View All Comments
Kocur - Monday, June 27, 2005 - link
Ouch, sorry for the double post:).
Well, it is a pitty that some crapy reference motherborad from nowhere has been used for this review. Moreover, the settings (2, 2, 2, 10) were also not optimal for nForce4 chipset. To tell you the truth, I expected testing with at least DDR500, because it is how you would run this processor.
Also I find quite funny that Anandtech got such a miserably overclocking processor. People on other sites reach 3GHz on air.
What about power consumption comparison?
I expected much more from Anandtech.
Kocur.
Kocur - Monday, June 27, 2005 - link
projecteda - Monday, June 27, 2005 - link
Doom 3 benchies have the FX-55 listed twice.Marlin1975 - Monday, June 27, 2005 - link
Need the X2 and P-D to REALLY see where this chip lines up as well, money wise to peroformance.Rapsven - Monday, June 27, 2005 - link
Waste of cash. Might as well just get a dual core.RyzenRaisin - Monday, December 18, 2017 - link
Oh if you guys could only have fathomed the power that Ryzen was to behold. Such silly humans of yesteryear.