Audio Performance

We limited audio testing to the Rightmark 3D Sound version 2 CPU utilization test. This benchmark measures the overhead or CPU utilization required by a codec or hardware audio chip.

Audio Performance - Empty CPU - 32 Buffers

Audio Performance - 2d Audio - 32 Buffers

Audio Performance - DirectSound 3D HW - 32 Buffers

Audio Performance - DirectSound 3D EAX2 - 32 Buffers

As you can see, none of the onboard audio solutions were quite as low in CPU utilization as the reference Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS. However, MSI's Creative Sound Blaster Live! 24-bit on board solution offers very acceptable performance and is definitely a better solution than the standard NVIDIA AC97 solutions in the market place.

The Gigabyte's Realtek ALC 882M fully supports Intel's Azalia High Definition Audio standard and boasts impressive specifications for a host-based audio solution. Unfortunately, the Realtek ALC 882M does not fare as well against the Creative Sound Blaster Live! solution in the benchmarks. However, both MSI and Gigabyte deserve praise for offering solutions that a large majority of owners will find acceptable as an audio solution.

We will expand our audio testing in the future to include additional Rightmark 3D Sound results, RMAA 5.5 measurements to further clarify the quality of audio signals being generated, and a review of the software applications that ship with these on-board solutions.

Ethernet Performance Final Words
Comments Locked

19 Comments

View All Comments

  • smn198 - Friday, September 23, 2005 - link

    Welcome Gary. Look forward to seeing more from you.
  • Gary Key - Friday, September 23, 2005 - link

    smn198,

    Thank you. I really enjoyed doing this article, working with Wes, and having the opportunity to share my experiences with the great members and visitors here at AnandTech. I certainly hope you will be seeing more from me. ;-)

    Sincerely,
    Gary Key
  • Evan Lieb - Friday, September 23, 2005 - link

    Welcome Gary, and have fun!
  • Ecmaster76 - Friday, September 23, 2005 - link

    Looks like it went up early.

    Good read though. At first I was like "Holy $#!+" when I saw the gaming benchmarks, but then they mentioned about the Gigabyte BIOS being effed up.
  • cryptonomicon - Thursday, September 22, 2005 - link

    DRAM Voltage Auto, 1.80V to 2.3V in 0.1V increments


    uh.. but isnt ram like 2.5-2.8v?
  • Pete84 - Friday, September 23, 2005 - link

    DDR2 runs at much lower vdimm than DDR.
  • cryptonomicon - Friday, September 23, 2005 - link

    ah yes of course..

    so much for active cooling then
  • BlvdKing - Thursday, September 22, 2005 - link

    I can't believe the Nforce 4 for AMD supports dual core but the Intel edition only has limited support and no support for the 820.
  • coomar - Wednesday, September 21, 2005 - link

    no a diamond can't beat a royal flush

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now