FIRST LOOK: NVIDIA GeForce 6100 Performance
by Wesley Fink on September 22, 2005 1:29 PM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
Gaming Performance
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
43 Comments
View All Comments
sprockkets - Thursday, September 22, 2005 - link
It has already been shown that the local FB has no effect on performacne here. But it does allow for not taking away from the main memory.Vol2005 - Monday, September 26, 2005 - link
ATi Xpress 200G @ 450MHz ---- 3DMark 2001SE = 6,396, 3DMark 03 = 1724, 3DMark 05 = 815. (687 05's @300MHz-default)http://www.hkepc.com/hwdb/c51-firstlook-test.htm">http://www.hkepc.com/hwdb/c51-firstlook-test.htm
sprockkets - Thursday, September 22, 2005 - link
$80 at newegg.comBtw, can you use the VGA out for HDTV output? Because they do not show any way of hooking up this model to a tv.
JarredWalton - Thursday, September 22, 2005 - link
No - not unless your HDTV has a VGA input. (Some do, but they tend to cost $3000+.)HarryAsse - Thursday, September 22, 2005 - link
Would the 6100 be faster than a 9700pro?Brunnis - Thursday, September 22, 2005 - link
Most certainly not. It is very far from the 9700 Pro.linkgoron - Thursday, September 22, 2005 - link
Budget PCs don't have AMD 4000+, but 3000+, and won't have 2 x 512MB OCZ PC3200 Platinum Rev. 2 RAM... They'll get 30% lower fps (I think, correct me if I'm wrong) in most games...Wesley Fink - Thursday, September 22, 2005 - link
The comparison was between the nVidia GeForce 6100 and the current best ATI RS480. As long as we used the same CPU and memory for testing both boards it really didn't matter what CPU we used. The 4000+ is now $368 at New Egg, a little less than the 3800+ x2, and more mid-range than value. The 3000+ costs around $150. We have used the 4000+ in all recent motherboard reviews, so we thought the 4000+ would be easier to compare to other boards we've tested.jediknight - Saturday, September 24, 2005 - link
It would still be nice to see reviews where budget components (like mobos with integrated graphics) are paired with other budget components (CPU, RAM, etc.) such that the performance numbers more accurately resemble real-world performance.Using top-end processors and memory present an unrealistically optimistic picture of real-world performance.. because these combinations are really not likely to be seen.
Furen - Thursday, September 22, 2005 - link
Framerate shouldnt bee much lower since these systems are insanely graphics-bound. They could be a bit lower but I wouldnt expect more than a frame or two (per seccond) lower.