Gigabyte GA-G1 975X: Will a Turbo help the Pentium 4?
by Gary Key on November 11, 2005 12:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
General & Gaming Performance
General Performance
Gaming Performance
The NVIDIA nForce4 Intel Edition SLI has clearly offered superior gaming and workstation performance in the past when compared directly to the Intel 955x and Intel 945P platform. However, Gigabyte's implementation of the 975X chipset has certainly closed the gap in performance and in the synthetic tests exceeded it. Overall memory performance has improved drastically compared to the Intel 955X boards. Apparently the reported optimizations made in the Intel Memory Pipeline technology is correct.
Our F.E.A.R. results are based upon settings found in the recent Anandtech GPU performance test. We also ran the NVIDIA 81.85 WHQL drivers as a comparison to the NVIDIA 78.01 WHQL drivers on the Gigabyte GA-G1 975x as we will be moving to these for future test results. The increase in scores going from the 78.01 to 81.85 drivers are impressive in several applications.
We will be putting this board through additional video testing and will be offering CrossFire results along with a surprise or two in the full article.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
30 Comments
View All Comments
Spacecomber - Friday, November 11, 2005 - link
From the article,Why not go ahead and report what aftermarket heatsinks did fit, and if you had any that didn't, mention those as well? It would also be helpful, and in line with the previous poster's comment about wanting to see the board installed in a case, to see what the motherboard would look like with a one of the popular oversized heatsinks mounted on the CPU. I think that this would go a long way to give a sense of scale to the pictures of how much room there is around the CPU socket and whether it is crowded by the "turbo" feature.
Just a couple of wishes that might make a good review better.
Keep up the good work.
Space
Gary Key - Friday, November 11, 2005 - link
Hi,I will list out the heatsink/fans that fit and provide a case picture in the full review. I always test the motherboards in a typical mid-size ATX case and not on a test bench. I think utilizing a test bench does not account for installation, fitment, connection, or thermal issues. This is one area that I am convinced that if the board is not tested in a case that we are doing a disservice to the readership.
Please email me if you want to a preview picture of the board in the case with a large Gigabyte or Thermaltake heatsink/fan setup installed already.
Gary Key - Friday, November 11, 2005 - link
I was wondering how long it would take for that comment to be made. ;-> However, every little bit helps when you have a Pentium 4 at this time. :>
Your statements about the fans are a concern of mine as well. We have the system running 24/7 with varying degrees of climate changes in the room at this time. I will report on any changes in the sound or vibration levels in the full article. Gigabyte has assured us the fan design under went rigorous testing before manufacturing commenced.
tuteja1986 - Friday, November 11, 2005 - link
I trust gigabyte : ) they are a cool company and i don't think the tiny fan would die. If i was going to buy a Intel CPU then i would difinitely buy this motherboard. I am hopping Gigabyte comes out with AMD 64 version but anyways this is a awesome motherboard that i would recommend to any wanting to have an Intel SLI setup :)xsilver - Friday, November 11, 2005 - link
sorry if this offends you but you sound like a gigabyte plantmost enthusists dont use gigabyte at all as their overclocking is usually mediocre
and about the fans -- i know from expierience
1 of those tiny fans after 5 months sounded like a blender and was much louder than everything in the entire system
I cant imagine how bad 4 of them will be
oh - and its not just gigabyte, most if not all 40mm fans suck, no wait, blow, no wait :P
Gary Key - Friday, November 11, 2005 - link
No offense taken. :-)Gigabyte is working diligently to establish their top tier motherboards as a choice of the enthusiast again. This board and bios was able to overclock our 840EE further than any other board we have tested to date. How it performs with a single core processor will be revealed in the full article. We also have updated bios from Asus so the results should be interesting. ;-)
I am not totally convinced about the fan setup either but I promise you I am beating on them at this time. I think Asus's fanless heat exchange system is a more eloquent and desirable system. I will have a thermal comparison in the full review.
Zebo - Friday, November 11, 2005 - link
Gigabyte trying to cheat by 6Mhz x multi right out of the box? Crazy but not as crazy as those 4 whinny fans. All 40 & 60mm fans whine like crazy to move any air whatsoever, in the 4000-7000rpm range and why I take them off every chipset I've ever owned. (be sure and replace with large passive HS) But 4??!!? Well thankfully most PD buyers have a super tornado on processor to mask the whine...or add to it.Kudos to Intel for another great chipset supporting both x-fire and SLi.. Wish they'd make em for AMD processors too.
Gary Key - Friday, November 11, 2005 - link
I was upset about this and not because they are doing it as just about everyone else has had FSB creap also. What upset me was going to manual mode and entering 200FSB, seeing 200x16 on post, and then finding out through Everest or CPU-Z that it still was at 206FSB. I tried all settings up to 206 with the same result. I posted that comment in the test setup section but will go into further details in the full article. I would be careful of any future performance tests available on this board as it can be missed based upon how the bios reports the settings at post. I have relayed my concerns to Gigabyte. In fact, I am going to update the article at this time as it has just upset me once again. :(
johnsonx - Friday, November 11, 2005 - link
feeling a bit feisty this morning Gary?Gary Key - Friday, November 11, 2005 - link
Not now, :->
Live and learn... This was my "first look or preview" type article and as such I am still learning. I appreciate the comments good or bad and will take them to heart for the next one. I certainly cannot improve or address the wants of the readership without honest feedback.
We wanted to get a preview out on this board and more importantly the expected performance of the 975X chipset before the boards hit the market next week. There are several test comments I have noted for the full article about the board that were touched on but not fully detailed (some additional details added now)in the preview. We will also have single core testing, thermals, expanded audio testing (X-Fi and others), CrossFire results, and a couple of surprises coming up. I think the full article and additional testing will be well received (from an Intel user viewpoint).
In this "First Look" we wanted to show the board and provide technical specifics about it so we can go straight to the additional testing and results in the full article along with providing details about the 975X chipset itself. Hopefully, we will have additional 975X boards to compare against also if time permits, if not we will follow up in a couple of weeks.
As a side note- I am doing everything possible to test the Turbojet fan setup accurately. We did not publish Gigabyte's claims as to thermal improvements as we want to prove this in a typical user environment. Although initial results look very good regarding thermals I believe at this time Asus has the better overall solution.