3D Rendering

3dsmax 6

For our 3dsmax test we used version 6 of the program and ran the SPECapc rendering tests to truly stress these CPUs.

3dsmax6 - SPECapc for 3dsmax

3D rendering performance has been improved tremendously thanks to the move to dual cores as well as the FP performance enhancements in Yonah.

The graphs below are the actual render times used in calculating the composite score shown above:

3dsmax6 - 3dsmax5 rays

3dsmax6 - CBALLS2

3dsmax6 - SinglePipe2

3dsmax6 - UnderWater

Gaming Performance Multitasking Performance
Comments Locked

135 Comments

View All Comments

  • monsoon - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    i am waiting for overclocking tests and most of all the coming release of a MAC MINI with this baby inside. I'm going to run windows on it if possible ( so does it come with VT or not ? ). Hopefully january won't be a let down from apple...
  • tfranzese - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    Are you dense?

    Ask yourself: What's the mini's price point? Now, what do you think this chip's price point will be?

    I think you're dreaming.
  • Furen - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    I wouldnt quite put it like that. I think single-core Yonahs will find themselves thrown into the cheaper Mac Minis, I dunno if apple will actually make a premium version with the dual-core CPUs.
  • forPPP - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    I don't understand all those comments that AMD is 2 year ahead because Athlon 64 X2 3800+ is on average 8% faster.
    Yohan is MOBILE cpu, while Athlon 64 X2 is desktop. Please compare Yohan with Turion and then complain.
    Intel has lead with 65 nm technology which means AMD won't catch it up for very long in mobile market. Turion dual core at 90 nm will be far far behind Yohan.
  • rpsgc - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    quote:

    Please compare Yohan with Turion and then complain.


    Yonah is a 65nm dual-core, Turion is a 90nm single-core....
  • forPPP - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    [quote]Yonah is a 65nm dual-core, Turion is a 90nm single-core....[/quote]
    And that's why for now there is nothing to compare. Yonah is its in own class. Even "Turion Dual Core" will be behind it, because of power consumption problem.
  • tfranzese - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    quote:

    Yonah is its in own class.


    Really? I can't pick a notebook up today that has one, so comparing a processor that's been shipping for quite some time to this one means little.

    Further, no one seems to point it out, but does Yonah not have 64-bit extensions? If not, now that near every desktop CPU sold today has them it'd be a real shame if 64-bit Windows development gained momentum.
  • forPPP - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    quote:

    Further, no one seems to point it out, but does Yonah not have 64-bit extensions? If not, now that near every desktop CPU sold today has them it'd be a real shame if 64-bit Windows development gained momentum.

    Great point. You are right. It's the biggest disadvantage of the Yonah.
  • Viditor - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    quote:

    Even "Turion Dual Core" will be behind it, because of power consumption problem


    WHAT power consumption problem?
  • Shintai - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    Maybe the power problem with adding over twice the transistors.

    Dothan->Yonah ~140mio to ~151mio ~8% more transistors
    Turion->Turion X2 ~105mio to ~233mio(X2 current) ~121% more transistors.

    And transistors = powerusage.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now