Audio Encoding Performance

We will utilize iTunes 7.4 for our audio encoding test, as it is one of the most utilized audio applications available due to the immense popularity of the iPod. As in previous articles, we are using an INXS Greatest Hits CD for testing, which contains 16 tracks totaling 606MB of songs. We use iTunes to convert our WAV files into ACC or MP3 compatible formats. We utilize 320kbps or 256kbps and variable bit rate options for both tests.


Audio
Encoding Performance - iTunes 7.4

Audio
Encoding Performance - iTunes 7.4

We usually see iTunes favoring a system with excellent CPU throughput and these tests indicate the Neo2-FR board is up to speed in this area. However, if it is not apparent by now, all of the P35 boards score within 2% of each other and it is difficult to discern any differences during actual usage of the application.

File Compression Performance

In order to save space on our hard drives and provide another CPU crunching utility, we utilize WinRAR 3.70 to perform compression tests. WinRAR fully supports multithreaded operations for users with dual core or multi-processor systems. Our test folder contains 444 files, 10 subfolders, and 602MB worth of data. We utilize default settings in WinRAR and defragment our hard drive before each test.


File
Compression Performance - WinRAR 3.70

The nature of file compression is such that memory is accessed almost constantly in a very random fashion, so page misses requiring additional time as memory banks are swapped is common. Even with a slight disadvantage in memory latencies, we notice the MSI board still has very good CPU/Memory throughput. It finishes 0.5 seconds behind the Platinum board, which leads the P35 pack.

Rendering Performance

For 3D modeling and rendering, we are using the CINEBENCH R10 benchmark. CINEBENCH 10 features two different benchmarks with one test utilizing a single core and the second test highlighting the power of multiple cores in rendering the benchmark image. We utilize the standard multi-core benchmark and default settings.


General
Performance - Cinebench 10

The Neo2-FR board performs well in this CPU intensive test and finishes right behind the Platinum board.

Images and Video Encoding Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

35 Comments

View All Comments

  • DigitalFreak - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - link

    I sincerely hope that the USB port block on the back is supported by more than just that tiny riser. That thing looks like it would break off if you looked at it funny.
  • Griswold - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - link

    Nothing to worry about, unless some clumsy fool or 8 year old child rams the USB plug in.
  • superkdogg - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - link

    Reading the introduction about the surprising performance of the new MSI board got my ears up, but then I read the article and it was more of the same.

    Every motherboard performs virtually the same these days at stock speeds. The only things that differentiate anything is overclocking/bios, reliability, layout, price, extra features (if you need them), and personal brand preference.

    Motherboard 'reviews' could pretty much be replaced by a table that tells a consumer about those things above. Benchmarking showing that everything is +/- 2% from the median just eats up space.
  • j@cko - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - link

    LOL. I totally agree with ya. Motherboard review nowadays is more about reliability and overclockability, I think.
  • JarredWalton - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - link

    The problem is, if we were to eliminate all of the benchmarking, how do we really know if a board is reliable? If you haven't noticed, 90% or something of the text on the benchmark pages is filler - the graphs pretty much say everything you need to know. Anyway, doing motherboard reviews can be a thankless endeavor, but we still think it's necessary. We're not quite at the "necessary evil" stage either. :)
  • brian_riendeau - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - link

    Its quite easy really to show the effectiveness of a mobo design without wasting 5 pages on graphs that show no difference between 10 models of motherboards.

    Test the motherboards in harsh environments. No one really cares if their board is 1% faster than another board, however they will care if their whole system crashes repeatedly if their AC goes out and the room temp gets up to 90F.
  • drebo - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - link

    Death of the P35 Neo-F, one of the best mid-range boards ever made. For $85 you get a superb P35 board, but they're not making it anymore. Moving to this board, you lose Parallel and Serial ports, which for many general home users are very important.

    Intel doesn't make a P35 board with parallel or serial, and ASUS's P5K board is about $40 more expensive. I really wish a tier 1 manufacturer would come out with another good board. The last couple generations it's been MSI, with the P965 Neo3-F and then the P35 Neo-F. Looks as though there won't be a P35 Neo2-F, unfortunately. They're making a hybrid DDR2/DDR3 board instead, which neuters any kind of RAM upgrades for the end users because you can only use one or the other, not both, and neither in a dual-channel configuration.

    Oh well. Maybe ASUS will drop the price of their P5K board.
  • Ratinator - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - link

    [quote]Moving to this board, you lose Parallel and Serial ports, which for many general home users are very important. [/quote]

    Did you mean not very important?

  • drebo - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - link

    No, I didn't. You'd be surprised how many people at home have serial mice they don't want to replace (old trackballs that they're too stubborn to get rid of) and parallel printers. A lot of people in the business world need them, too. They need parallel for printers and serial to run machines off of, or for their PDAs, or for other reasons.

    There needs to be a good midrange board that still supports these legacy devices, and with the P35 Neo-F going by the wayside, that board just doesn't exist anymore.
  • brian_riendeau - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - link

    I am sorry to inform you of this, however not many people shopping for new motherboards for business or personal use care about serial and parallel ports. You just gotta let things go man... Anyone who really needs to use a legacy port can pickup USB port -> legacy port adapters for cheap if they really need to use old hardware. We have a whole department of people where I work still chained to serial devices, however they all have C2D and Quad core PCs now and just use USB adapters.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now