Sample Images

Since the Canon XSi is targeted at the entry-level DSLR market, all sample images were shot with the XSi kit lens, the EF-S (crop-sensor only) 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 IS. This will likely be the way most buyers purchase the XSi and it seemed fairest to provide sample images shot only with this lens, much as most users will start with the XSi.

All images are full-size straight from the Canon XSi. They have not been cropped or processed in Canon software or Photoshop CS3, even though post-processing can definitely improve the impact of the images. Click on any of the smaller images below to view or save the original image.

Canon offers a very extensive line of lenses and all available EOS lenses should work on the XSi, including full-frame and crop-sensor EF-S lenses. Buyers can step up to better Canon optics, but the included images are typical of those that can be shot with the Image Stabilized kit lens.

The recent Canon release of the reasonably priced Image-Stabilized EF-S 55-250mm f4-5.6 lens will likely mean this IS pair will be offered in two-lens kits for the XSi in the future. With these two lenses Canon shooters can cover the 35mm equivalent of 29mm to 400mm with two small, light lenses that both feature Optical Image Stabilization for up to 4 stops of improvement for hand-held shooting in lower light. The new 55-250mm IS lens is now selling alone at a street price of $300 or less.

Note: Images are 3.1 to 7.5 MB in size.













Final Thoughts
Comments Locked

56 Comments

View All Comments

  • pinto4402 - Monday, May 5, 2008 - link

    Your observation about Canon's overly warm/red WB in tungsten lighting is shared by many camera reviewers/users. It's a "problem" that has been noted for a long time. Some people actually prefer the overly warm colors, though. I'm sure this is the reason why Canon has never fixed their WB.

  • Deadtrees - Monday, May 5, 2008 - link

    "Working range AF specifications are the same EV range of -0.5EV to 18EV. However, the 40D adds an additional diagonal cross-type sensor with greater precision for f2.8 lenses, providing better support for fast Canon L lenses."

    - Not trying to be picky or anything but that is somewhat misleading as not all L lenses have aperture values faster than f/2.8.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Overall, the Sony A350 actually does better against the Canon XSi than we really expected and acquits itself quite well for a higher resolution sensor that should be showing greater noise than the Canon XSi. Resolution and noise control to ISO 1600 on the Sony holds its own against a sensor maker than has been the low-noise standard since DSLRs began."

    - Keep in mind that A350 utilizes quite agressive noise deduction algorithms resulting smudged water color like images. If you think less noise is good no matter what, I guess it's not so bad. But, what about details that are lost? Do you really want over 10mp dslr images to show details as cell phone cameras? Hell, in that case, even point-and-shoot panasonic cameras that are known for crazy noise reduction algorithm can compete head to head with Nikon D3.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    BTW, I really suggest you to change the test subject. It's glossy coated hardboard papers which makes it virtually impossible to see the loss of details caused by insance noise reduction algorithms.



  • Lord 666 - Monday, May 5, 2008 - link

    Wes,

    If you are comparing the XTi vs. XSi vs. 40D, why not include the D300 as well to compare against?
  • Wesley Fink - Monday, May 5, 2008 - link

    We will include the D300 results in Part 2 of our Digital Sensor article. We will be comparing resolution and noise in different sensor categories, such as 14 megapixel, 12 megapixel, and 10 megapixel.

    I did toy with the idea of including the D300 in comparisons in this review, but I figured Canon to past Canon XTi to top Canon prosumer 40D was a bit more logical than a $800 body to a $1800 body. I'll leave that comparison for the digital sensor article.
  • complectus - Monday, May 5, 2008 - link

    Is that a Frank Lloyd Wright house in 2 of the Sample Images?
  • Wesley Fink - Monday, May 5, 2008 - link

    Yes it is Frank Lloyd Wright. I am fortunate that a real Wright house is in my neighborhood. The furniture was also custom built for the rooms in th eWright house, as was typical of many of his home designs.

    It was built in the early 1900's and is contemporary to the other homes in the photographs. I figured someone would catch it.
  • pinto4402 - Monday, May 5, 2008 - link

    For about five minutes, I was interested in the Xsi as a lightweight backup camera body for event photography. However, the lack of a CF card slot completely nixes this idea. It doesn't make any sense for Canon to switch from CF to SD, other than to attract P&S owners who want to migrate to a DSLR. By doing so, however, Canon effectively excluded us existing DSLR owners who already have many of their lenses and who would be more likely to purchase. I can tolerate the Xsi's plastic body, but I'm not going to invest in new storage media just to use this camera.
  • Wesley Fink - Monday, May 5, 2008 - link

    You can buy a 16GB class 6 hi-speed SD card for $55, a 4GB Class 6 for about $20, or an 8GB for around $30. I can't believe that small expense would keep you from buying and using the XSi if you really wanted to.

    Nikon uses SD on the D80 and D60, Pentax uses it on the K20D and K200D. Sony still uses CF, but new Sony lenses cost a lot more than today's cheap SD and CF memory.
  • RDaneel - Monday, May 5, 2008 - link

    I have no problem with AT doing camera reviews, I think it's a valuable perspective for hobbyists and prosumers. Obviously AT isn't going to review $1500 lenses...

    That being said, this review reads more like Canon ad copy than a real comparative review. There isn't any serious examination of the image quality, and it feels like more effort is spent in comparing the number of AF points and megapixels than really looking at the camera as a DSLR system or really talking about IQ. Just kind of a disappointment, normally the objectivity on AT is a bit better. Did the author get to keep the free press sample? ;)
  • Wesley Fink - Monday, May 5, 2008 - link

    There was no Press sample - not even a loaner. We had to buy the XSi that was reviewed. The same goes for the Nikon D60 and Sony A350 that were compared to the XSi. Since we bought them all we owe nothing to any manufacturer.

    The XSi won't replace my D300 or my Pentax K20D, but it is a really superb entry camera.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now