Intel DH57JG “Jet Geyser” - Intel's First Mini-ITX H57
by Rajinder Gill on March 1, 2010 2:00 PM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
Board Features
Intel’s MSRP for the DH57JG is set around $125; the board should be in retail channels within a couple of weeks.
Intel DH57JG | |
Market Segment |
General Use/HTPC
|
CPU Interface |
LGA-1156
|
CPU Support |
LGA-1156 i3/i5 Pentium/Clarkdale Series of Processors Only
|
Chipset |
Intel H57 Express Chipset
|
BCLK Speeds |
133-240MHz in 1MHz increments
|
DDR3 Memory Speed |
800, 1067, 1333 Frequency Ratios
|
Core Voltage |
Fixed at Stock Processor VID
|
CPU Vdroop Compensation |
N/A
|
CPU Clock Multiplier |
Stock Multiplier or Stock Multiplier with Turbo Only for Clarkdale. Multiplier Control available for Lynnfield Only.
|
DRAM Voltage (DDR3) |
Auto, 1.20V - 1.70V in 0.05V increments (1.50V base)
|
DRAM Timing Control |
tCL, tRCD, tRP, tRAS
|
DRAM Command Rate |
N/A
|
PCH Voltage |
N/A
|
CPU VTT (Uncore) Voltage |
1.1V - 1.25V in 0.05V increments
|
CPU PLL Voltage |
N/A
|
Memory Slots |
Two 240-pin DDR3 DIMM Slots
|
Dual-Channel Configuration
|
|
Regular Unbuffered DDR3 Memory to 8GB Total
|
|
Expansion Slots |
1 x PCIe X16 Slot
|
Onboard SATA/RAID |
|
Onboard USB 2.0 |
12 USB 2.0 ports (6) I/O Panel, 6 via brackets
|
Onboard LAN |
Intel 82578DC X1 (PCIe)
|
Onboard Audio |
Realtek ALC889 High Definition Audio Codec, 7.1 Channel
|
Power Connectors |
ATX 24-pin, 4-pin EPS 12V
|
I/O Panel |
1 x RJ45
|
6 x USB 2.0/1.1 (1 x eSATA Combo)
|
|
1 x Optical Toslink
|
|
6 Audio I/O Jacks
|
|
Other Onboard Connectors |
1 x Serial, 1 x S/PDIF, 1 x FPA, 1 x FP Connector, 3 x USB Headers (6 ports supported)
|
Fan Headers |
1 CPU + 1 Additional Header (Both 4-pin)
|
Fan Control |
Temperature related fan control offered (2 settings) - controls both headers (adjusts 4-pin fans only) - via BIOS only
|
Package Contents |
SATA Cable x 2, I/O Panel x 1, User Manual, Driver DVD
|
Board/BIOS Revisions Used |
Board Rev: N/A, BIOS Version: 0217
|
Warranty |
3 Year Standard
|
The only notable component choice on the DH57JG is the Intel 82578DC NIC, rather than the standard Realtek offering included by most vendors at this price point. Realtek is not absent from Intel’s choices altogether though, the ALC889 codec is used to supply 7.1 HD audio. Unfortunately, Intel have not licensed any Dolby upscaling features like you find on Gigabyte's H55/H57 m-ATX boards, which is a bit of a kicker.
Included with the board you get the following peripherals/items:
- 2 X SATA cables
- 1 X I/O backplate
- 1 X User manual
- 1 X Driver CD
We’d have preferred the addition of a couple of extra SATA cables seeing as Intel have opted to use the H57 chipset, which supports RAID.
There’s nothing exciting on the software CD either; it contains system drivers and Intel’s “Silent Install” GUI only. Silent Install is included to make driver installation quick and easy, you just tick the drivers you want, provide the software with your Windows login (if need be) and leave the machine alone for the rest of the installation process.
BIOS
BIOS options for overclocking are rather limited, although some of the limitations seem to fit the mini-ITX form factor well based upon what we’ve seen to date. Voltage control is on offer for CPU VTT and VDIMM only, there’s no option to change processor Vcore on tap. We understand the decision to omit voltage increases for Vcore, but feel that Intel should have included a small selection of under-voltage options for ulta low power consumption lovers. On that subject, multiplier ratio control is also absent for Clarkdale CPU's when using the current public BIOS. Although Lynnfield CPU's do get multiplier change options by disabling SpeedStep - we think Intel should allow multiplier changes on the Clarkdale's too.
The only other suggestion we have is for the performance section of Intel’s BIOS; the CPU VTT and VDIMM options should be moved from the advanced menu of the DRAM timing page so that you don’t have to access memory timings just to set voltages.
If you do push BCLK too far the BIOS watchdog will attempt to recover and boot into safe mode allowing you to change any offending settings. There were a couple of instances where we pushed BCLK past 150 MHz and the board got caught in an endless reboot loop that could only be cleared by setting the BIOS jumper to safe-mode. Trouble is that it can be a little fiddly getting to the jumper in a cramped PC case so it would have been better for Intel to place the jumper on the rear I/O panel for ease of use.
Fan control is automatic and varies according to CPU core temperature. You get two options to control the speed ramp and damping slope which can be set to less/more aggressive to suit the efficiency of your heatsink . The system fan header speed is also controlled by CPU temperature, but you’ll need a 4 pin PWM fan to take advantage of this feature; using a 3-pin fan results in what appears to be a fixed speed operation.
BIOS flashing is made very easy by Intel; a built in flash routine is included in the BIOS that can be used with USB pen drives or HDD’s. If you head over to the Intel support site, you get no fewer than four different flashing options, ranging from burning a CD image to downloading an executable file that instigates a BIOS flash from Windows. Unlike other OS level flashing routines though, Intel’s utility reboots the motherboard and automatically flashes the BIOS outside the operating system – it’s very slick.
34 Comments
View All Comments
DanNeely - Monday, March 1, 2010 - link
Aren't benchmark numbers for CPUs almost always lower than reported TDPs? Intel/etc have to design for peak theoretical power draws even if they're extremely unlikely in real life. The intel burntest utility will run your CPU hotter and draw more power than any "normal" CPU benchmarks because it's designed to run everything at the highest power load possible.deruberhanyok - Monday, March 1, 2010 - link
It would be great if you all could look into testing with less... beefy power supplies, though. I think a lot of people (myself included) would be interested to see the power draw in a more "realistic" setup.For example, Antec's ISK 300-65 with a 65W power supply, or 300-150 with a 150W power supply, are a much more likely configuration than a system with a 610W PSU (as used in the recent Zotac H55 ITX article) or a 950W PSU (as used in this article). And the difference in power supply could make for a noticeable difference in idle/load numbers.
For low-power purposes, perhaps the boards could also be tested with low power memory modules (1.35v instead of 1.5v / 1.65v) and 2.5" hard drives (as many ITX enclosures may not have space for a 3.5" hard drive).
Anyways, these are just a few suggestions that I thought would help make the information presented here more practical. Feel free to ignore them. :)
Loving these articles on ITX boards, keep 'em coming!
FATCamaro - Tuesday, March 2, 2010 - link
Yeah 600W PSU is crazy. As well there is no mention of stability or quirks versus the other H55/57 boards tested.For those looking for virtualization intel has a Q57 board with VT-d support with an i5 or i7 processor.
Rajinder Gill - Tuesday, March 2, 2010 - link
Hi,Point taken on the PSU. For a rundown of stability and quirks of the other boards used check out these articles:
http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3732">http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3732
http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3748">http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3748
later
Raja
DanNeely - Monday, March 1, 2010 - link
I'd like to second this request. PSU efficiency drops off at the low and high ends of their output ranges. Optimal levels are generally around 50% of max and while performance doesn't suffer much in the 20-80% load.If you're concerned about noise you generally want to avoid going above about 70% with normal desktop PSUs to keep the fan spinning at idle. I'm not sure if the fan noise thresholds are true of the low power models designed for mini-itx systems with onboard gfx or not.
JonnyDough - Monday, March 1, 2010 - link
I concur with your post. Realistic PSU makes a huge difference.Rajinder Gill - Monday, March 1, 2010 - link
Thanks, we're working on it...GeorgeH - Monday, March 1, 2010 - link
DH57JG, DH57G, and a DH55JG; either you’re reviewing 3 different boards or breaking a NDA. Hopefully the latter, as I’d really like to see a cheaper H55 option. ;)gtrgtgt - Sunday, March 7, 2010 - link
http://www.ccshoper.com">http://www.ccshoper.com
Rajinder Gill - Monday, March 1, 2010 - link
Sorry about that - fixed..