Content Creation, General Usage and Memory Performance



Content Creation is a benchmark that has long been dominated by Intel's Pentium 4 processors. While the Abit KV8-Max3 did not quite perform at the level of the Athlon64 FX51, it is certainly competitive with P4 3.2GHz and compares well to other Athlon64 boards. Athlons normally outperform P4 on General Usage, but here, the Abit is an unusually strong performer, reaching FX51 performance levels.

Science Mark 2 was recently updated, and we used the latest 9/23/03 build for our Memory testing. The advantage of the on-CPU Memory Controller can clearly be seen in the very lowest latency levels for the Athlon64 compared to the FX51 and P4 3.2 processors. This very low latency is one of the reasons why the Athlon64 performs very well compared to Dual-Channel solutions. You can also see that while the FX51 has a very low latency compared to the P4, the latency overhead of Registered memory still increases latency compared to Athlon64 using regular unbuffered memory. Next year's Socket 939 should see a further drop in latency for the FX chip.

Performance Test Configuration Media Encoding and Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

2 Comments

View All Comments

  • toekramp - Monday, November 10, 2003 - link

    is it k8v or kv8?
  • perrye - Sunday, November 9, 2003 - link

    When will we see some benchmarks with 64-bit code? If Microsoft's OS is not up to the task, then make the effort to install Gentoo Linux, and get the most out the CPU. There are plenty of packages and tools for benchmarks in the Linux comunity.

    Perry

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now