NVIDIA 780i: Evolution Plus Triple SLI

23 Comments

View All Comments

• Dogbyte13 - Monday, January 7, 2008 - link

  how come no 16x16 on the 750i? will there be a performance hit with 16x8?

• edborden - Sunday, December 30, 2007 - link

  "The chipsets themselves, both 780i and 680i, are said to be perfectly capable of supporting Penryn if used on a modified board. It now appears a complete fix cannot be made with just a BIOS update for 680i; it is possible a BIOS update will allow dual-core Wolfdale to work as it should, but not quad-core Yorkfield. We will leave the official word for this with NVIDIA and their board partners."
  
  I just contacted my engineer at nVidia. He says:
  "We will be releasing a BIOS to support the Penryn Wolfdale's in the
  coming month, but there is no plan to support the Yorkfield quad-cores
  on NF680i."
  
  - Ed Borden, edborden.blogspot.com

• edborden - Sunday, December 30, 2007 - link

  nVidia had a bunch of new technologies to debut, and they wanted to do it all at the same time, with a new platform launch. Accomplishing the tech refresh on what is essentially the same chipset technology isn't necessarily a fact that has to make it non-event.
  
  I'm happy it's here - we had some significant issues with the 680i chipset and I'm hoping a re-work, some new features, and the psychological effect of a new model will help with.
  
  Also, the XFX and eVGA partner boards (both identical, manufactured by nVidia) look ALOT better than their 680i predecessors. Better cooling, especially.
  
  I blogged recently about us implementing these chipsets in our systems at http://edborden.blogspot.com/2007/12/nvidia-triple...">http://edborden.blogspot.com/2007/12/nvidia-triple...

• kevinkreiser - Tuesday, December 18, 2007 - link

  anyone know if the 780i might remedy the "display stopped responding" bug people like me are having? if so, it would be worth the upgrade.

• Fallen Kell - Wednesday, December 19, 2007 - link

  I stopped having that problem when I changed what drivers I was using. However, since either the CPU or the motherboard is dead (don't know which because the Gigabyte board does not have a BIOS CPU test (i.e. no beep code for bad CPU), I can't tell for sure what is dead, and since I don't have another 775 CPU or 775 socket motherboard....)
  
  Anyway, I started getting the problem in August/September when I updated my drivers, but when I reverted back to previous drivers, the issue went away.

• Fallen Kell - Tuesday, December 18, 2007 - link

  Without support for 1600 FSB anyone who buys this is just plain stupid. Nvidia has basically released a "fixed" 680i motherboard, and in reality people like myself who purchased the original 680i and did so because they were told, "Quad CPU, 1333 FSB, Penryn Support" should all be receiving these "fixed" boards for free... Without 1600 FSB support, you will not be able to use CPU's that arrive in 3 WEEKS! If it was 3 months, maybe a different story, but 3 WEEKS!!!!! Again, anyone who buys this is an idiot and a fool.

• aka1nas - Wednesday, December 19, 2007 - link

  You'll only be unable to run a single Extreme Edition Quad-core part without OC'ing the FSB. Regular Penryns will not be released at 1600FSB.

• ShantanuMalpani - Tuesday, December 18, 2007 - link

  While you have conducted a test with a single 8800 GTX, im surprised that you didnt conduct a test with two of them in SLI. with both the PCIE interconnects coming from a single bridge chip, and a rumour that they allow direct communication between them using the bridge chip(like first seen on RD580), there could be an improvement in SLI performance.
  Alternatively the added latency of going from the northbridge to the bridge chip might cause a decrease in performance.
  
  Also i assume that the NF200 bridge chip will be the one used in Skulltrail?

• chizow - Monday, December 17, 2007 - link

  Will be somewhat interested to see the OC'ing and Triple SLI results tomorrow but overall this seems a disappointing release.
  
  Honestly, it looks as if Penryn/700i is actually going to be worst for the enthusiast unless NV managed to also work out their FSB problems. If these boards can't hit higher FSB speeds than the 600-series, the higher stock FSB on Penryn (read: lower multipliers, locked upwards) will only make it harder to OC.
  
  Also was interesting about the layout and routing of the PCI-E lanes. I must have missed the PCI-E course for dummies but it seems like this board just totally shatters the previous NB/SB model as one of the SLI cards is being routed through the SB (MCP) and 2 through an "auxiliary" (n200) chip? Will be interesting to see how this impacts performance as I was under the impression that the lanes/traces from memory controller to GPU/RAM/CPU were the main bottlenecks in current PCs and this configuration just seems to add more of them.

• Frumious1 - Monday, December 17, 2007 - link

  I'm not sure if the article is "meh" or it it's the boards/chipsets. I'd have liked overclocking and additional performance results, and 3Dmark as a show of performance doesn't mean much outside of the ORB weenies. How about some actual games, and how about testing SLI with a couple of 8800GT cards to see if there are any tangible benefits to PCIe 2.0? I don't really expect much, but all we got was a "this is just 680i with a new chip on the board so we're not really doing much additional testing."
  
  I don't give a rip about Tri-SLI, but Penryn support and some actual testing of whether the new PCIe specification makes a difference would have been appreciated. Maybe we can get a follow-up article that's more of a real review instead of a quick chipset overview with some motherboard pictures thrown in at the end?