IGP Power Consumption - 780G, GF8200, and G35
by Gary Key on April 18, 2008 2:00 AM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
Test Setup
Gigabyte MA78GM-S2H Testbed | |
Processor | AMD Athlon LE1600, 4850E X2, Phenom 9550 |
CPU Voltage | 1.250V |
Cooling | AMD Retail |
Power Supply | Corsair CMPSU-520HX |
Memory | OCZ PC2-6400 ATI Edition (4x1GB) |
Memory Settings | DDR2-800, 4-4-4-12 1.90V |
Video Cards | On-board HD3200 |
Video Drivers | AMD 8.3 |
Hard Drive | Samsung HD501LJ |
Optical Drives | Sony BDU-X10S, LG GGW-H20L |
Case | Silverstone CW03S-MT |
Operating System | Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit |
. |
ASUS P5E-VM HDMI Testbed | |
Processor | Intel Core 2 Duo E2200 & E7200, Intel Core Quad Q9300 |
CPU Voltage | 1.250V |
Cooling | Intel Retail |
Power Supply | Corsair CMPSU-520HX |
Memory | OCZ PC2-6400 ATI Edition (4x1GB) |
Memory Settings | DDR2-800, 4-4-4-12 1.90V |
Video Cards | On-board X3500 |
Video Drivers | Intel 15.8 |
Hard Drive | Samsung HD501LJ |
Optical Drives | Sony BDU-X10S, LG GGW-H20L |
Case | Silverstone CW03S-MT |
Operating System | Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit |
. |
Biostar TF8200 A2+ Testbed | |
Processor | AMD Athlon LE1600, 4850E X2, Phenom 9550 |
CPU Voltage | 1.250V |
Cooling | AMD Retail |
Power Supply | Corsair CMPSU-520HX |
Memory | OCZ PC2-6400 ATI Edition (4x1GB) |
Memory Settings | DDR2-800, 4-4-4-12 1.90V |
Video Cards | On-board GeForce 8200 |
Video Drivers | NVIDIA 174.74 / 18.11 Platform |
Hard Drive | Samsung HD501LJ |
Optical Drives | Sony BDU-X10S, LG GGW-H20L |
Case | Silverstone CW03S-MT |
Operating System | Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit |
. |
Our tests today will concentrate on platform power requirements when playing back High Definition content and taking a leisurely flight around the Honolulu harbor with Flight Simulator X. We utilized PCMark Vantage to track power requirements for general office/home applications. The results were very similar to our HD playback scores so we omitted them for this particular article. We are not providing overclocking or discrete GPU numbers in today's article; this is all about the base setups we utilized for testing these chipsets.
Based on the 780G's penchant for HD playback and casual gaming, we figured the natural competitors in this particular segment would be the Intel G35 and NVIDIA GeForce 8200. Fortunately, we had several GeForce 8200 retail boards arrive this week. NVIDIA provided WHQL platform (18.11) and GPU (174.74) drivers on their website last week. However, these drivers still do not provide Hybrid SLI or HybridPower capabilities. We have already noticed several problems ranging from HDMI synchronizing to the inability of PowerDVD 8.0 or WinDVD 9.0 to recognize the driver set for playback capabilities in certain situations.
We selected identical components for our three testbeds, with the obvious exception of the motherboard and CPU. Our choice of processors represents three different levels. Our minimum spec processors consist of the AMD Athlon LE1600 and Intel Core 2 Duo E2200. Both of these processors are the recommend minimum we would use on these platforms in order to provide acceptable results with HD playback, general applications, and casual gaming. Our 2.5GHz capable AMD 4850e X2 and upcoming Intel E7200 represent a middle ground in performance. These two processors are the ones we would most likely purchase for our platforms. Our final selection consists of the latest entry-level quad-core processors from AMD and Intel, the Phenom 9550 and Core 2 Quad Q9300.
44 Comments
View All Comments
spinportal - Friday, April 18, 2008 - link
Hey Gary, shouldn't the last paragraph title be "Final Thoughts" instead of "First Thoughts"? Or did I read the article backwards? :)Visual - Friday, April 18, 2008 - link
They do this very often - I understand it as "the product is very new, just launching, and a lot more testing is expected; so far, this is what we think", but I've been confused by it too.Visual - Friday, April 18, 2008 - link
i am way out of the info loop now.are there no current nvidia igp chipsets for intel cpus?
smn198 - Friday, April 18, 2008 - link
Thanks for the article. I found it interesting and glad that a better performing IGP doesn't have to mean worse power efficiency.I'd like the performance per watt stats I've seen you do before and also it would be good to get an indication of how much a difference in running costs each platform would have over the year having made some assumptions on typical usage.
As you mentioned you focused on power which is important but there are many more considerations such as the materials and processes involved in making these components and the impact at EOL.
Hope to see more like this!